linux-kernel - [patch 3/6] x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230603200459.775471968@linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat,  3 Jun 2023 22:07:00 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [patch 3/6] x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead()

Monitoring idletask::thread_info::flags in mwait_play_dead() has been an
obvious choice as all what is needed is a cache line which is not written
by other CPUs.

But there is a use case where a "dead" CPU needs to be brought out of that
mwait(): kexec().

The CPU needs to be brought out of mwait before kexec() as kexec() can
overwrite text, pagetables, stacks and the monitored cacheline of the
original kernel. The latter causes mwait to resume execution which
obviously causes havoc on the kexec kernel which results usually in triple
faults.

Use a dedicated per CPU storage to prepare for that.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |   24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -101,6 +101,17 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_die_map);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct cpuinfo_x86, cpu_info);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_info);
 
+struct mwait_cpu_dead {
+	unsigned int	control;
+	unsigned int	status;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Cache line aligned data for mwait_play_dead(). Separate on purpose so
+ * that it's unlikely to be touched by other CPUs.
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct mwait_cpu_dead, mwait_cpu_dead);
+
 /* Logical package management. We might want to allocate that dynamically */
 unsigned int __max_logical_packages __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__max_logical_packages);
@@ -1758,10 +1769,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_wakeup_cpu0);
  */
 static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
 {
+	struct mwait_cpu_dead *md = this_cpu_ptr(&mwait_cpu_dead);
 	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 	unsigned int highest_cstate = 0;
 	unsigned int highest_subcstate = 0;
-	void *mwait_ptr;
 	int i;
 
 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
@@ -1796,13 +1807,6 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
 			(highest_subcstate - 1);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * This should be a memory location in a cache line which is
-	 * unlikely to be touched by other processors.  The actual
-	 * content is immaterial as it is not actually modified in any way.
-	 */
-	mwait_ptr = &current_thread_info()->flags;
-
 	wbinvd();
 
 	while (1) {
@@ -1814,9 +1818,9 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
 		 * case where we return around the loop.
 		 */
 		mb();
-		clflush(mwait_ptr);
+		clflush(md);
 		mb();
-		__monitor(mwait_ptr, 0, 0);
+		__monitor(md, 0, 0);
 		mb();
 		__mwait(eax, 0);