[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc21196b-a18a-ce3c-e3f3-4303abf4b9a3@arinc9.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 12:39:33 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 27/30] net: dsa: mt7530: introduce BPDU trapping
for MT7530 switch
On 4.06.2023 12:23, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 11:51:33AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> If the switch doesn't currently trap BPDUs, isn't STP broken?
>>
>> No, the BPDU_PORT_FW bits are 0 after reset. The MT7620 programming guide
>> states that frames with 01:80:C2:00:00:00 MAC DA (which is how the BPDU
>> distinction is being made) will follow the system default which means the
>> BPDUs will be treated as normal multicast frames.
>>
>> Only if all 3 bits are set will the BPDUs be dropped.
>
> Right, if you don't trap BPDUs just to the CPU but flood them, I believe
> the STP protocol won't behave properly with switching loops. Worth testing.
I've got no interest spending time playing around with STP at the moment
so I'm going to pass.
Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists