lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:52:34 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/35] 5.15.115-rc3 review

On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 at 09:37, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 04:37:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.115 release.
> > There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511):
> mips: 62 configs -> no failure
> arm: 99 configs -> no failure
> arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
> x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
> alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
> csky allmodconfig -> no failure
> powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
> riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
> s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
> xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
>
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

mips: Booted on ci20. No regression.
https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3695

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ