linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 27/30] net: dsa: mt7530: introduce BPDU trapping for MT7530 switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230604124701.svt2r3aveyybajc3@skbuf>
Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2023 15:47:01 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 27/30] net: dsa: mt7530: introduce BPDU trapping
 for MT7530 switch

On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 12:39:33PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 4.06.2023 12:23, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 11:51:33AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> > > > If the switch doesn't currently trap BPDUs, isn't STP broken?
> > > 
> > > No, the BPDU_PORT_FW bits are 0 after reset. The MT7620 programming guide
> > > states that frames with 01:80:C2:00:00:00 MAC DA (which is how the BPDU
> > > distinction is being made) will follow the system default which means the
> > > BPDUs will be treated as normal multicast frames.
> > > 
> > > Only if all 3 bits are set will the BPDUs be dropped.
> > 
> > Right, if you don't trap BPDUs just to the CPU but flood them, I believe
> > the STP protocol won't behave properly with switching loops. Worth testing.
> 
> I've got no interest spending time playing around with STP at the moment so
> I'm going to pass.

You can at the very least move it towards the beginning of the net-next patch
set, so that we can be sure it doesn't depend on the other refactoring work,
in case someone in the future makes a request for the patch to be backported
to stable.