linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2023 20:56:32 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, James Seo <james@...iv.tech>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists

On 6/3/23 22:55, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> It sounds to me like we should just prohibit (not allow) emails that
> don't have a To: recipient in them. It also sounds like mutt (and maybe
> other software) have problems.
> 

In mutt, there is a command for reply-to-all (named group-chat-reply),
but you need to assign key binding for it. I'd like to type Esc-g
for this purpose. The corresponding .muttrc is:

```
bind index,pager "<esc>g" group-chat-reply
```

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara