[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jNn1wHtF7c0XYKpM=XzZasdu3OwksUdqRFO3TyZwrPOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 18:04:26 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Basavaraj.Natikar@....com, Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ACPI: x86: Add pm_debug_messages for LPS0 _DSM
state tracking
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 9:32 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
> Enabling debugging messages for the state requires turning on dynamic
> debugging for the file. To make it more accessible, use
> `pm_debug_messages` and clearer strings for what is happening.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
I'm inclined to apply this one and the [1/4] at this point.
I can also apply the 2 remaining patches in this series if I get ACKs
for them from the respective subsystem maintainers.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> index e499c60c4579..7681f6ecab67 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static int lps0_dsm_func_mask;
>
> static guid_t lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft;
> static int lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft;
> +static int lps0_dsm_state;
>
> /* Device constraint entry structure */
> struct lpi_device_info {
> @@ -320,6 +321,44 @@ static void lpi_check_constraints(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static bool acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd(void)
> +{
> + return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *acpi_sleep_dsm_state_to_str(unsigned int state)
> +{
> + if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft || !acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd()) {
> + switch (state) {
> + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_OFF:
> + return "screen off";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_ON:
> + return "screen on";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY:
> + return "lps0 entry";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_EXIT:
> + return "lps0 exit";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_MS_ENTRY:
> + return "lps0 ms entry";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT:
> + return "lps0 ms exit";
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (state) {
> + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_ON_AMD:
> + return "screen on";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_OFF_AMD:
> + return "screen off";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY_AMD:
> + return "lps0 entry";
> + case ACPI_LPS0_EXIT_AMD:
> + return "lps0 exit";
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return "unknown";
> +}
> +
> static void acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(unsigned int func, unsigned int func_mask, guid_t dsm_guid)
> {
> union acpi_object *out_obj;
> @@ -331,14 +370,15 @@ static void acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(unsigned int func, unsigned int func_mask, g
> rev_id, func, NULL);
> ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
>
> - acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle, "_DSM function %u evaluation %s\n",
> - func, out_obj ? "successful" : "failed");
> + lps0_dsm_state = func;
> + if (pm_debug_messages_on) {
> + acpi_handle_info(lps0_device_handle,
> + "%s transitioned to state %s\n",
> + out_obj ? "Successfully" : "Failed to",
> + acpi_sleep_dsm_state_to_str(lps0_dsm_state));
> + }
> }
>
> -static bool acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd(void)
> -{
> - return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> -}
>
> static int validate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const char *uuid, int rev, guid_t *dsm_guid)
> {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists