[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f33106d5-ea0c-131c-f615-a8df4da58990@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 19:57:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] dt-bindings: display/msm: sc7180-dpu: Describe
SM6350 and SM6375
On 23/05/2023 09:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> SC7180, SM6350 and SM6375 use a rather similar hw setup for DPU, with
> the main exception being that the last one requires an additional
> throttle clock.
>
> It is not well understood yet, but failing to toggle it on makes the
> display hardware stall and not output any frames.
>
> Document SM6350 and SM6375 DPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists