[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5300deff-9967-d67b-91f4-6f47cf9f12ce@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 15:13:53 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<dm-devel@...hat.com>, <ebiggers@...nel.org>, <elliott@....com>,
<gmazyland@...il.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <bernie.keany@...el.com>,
<charishma1.gairuboyina@...el.com>,
<lalithambika.krishnakumar@...el.com>, <nhuck@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line
option for Key Locker
On 6/3/2023 9:37 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 08:22:24AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> +static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
>> +{
>> + /* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
>> + if (strlen(arg))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
>> + pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);
>
> Can we stop adding those just to remove them at some point later but
> simply do:
>
> clearcpuid=keylocker
>
> ?
Oh, I was not sure about this policy. Thanks, now I'm glad that I have
confidence in removing this.
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists