[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230605090803.43597523@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 09:08:03 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the mm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:
fs/btrfs/file.c
between commit:
39bf7bdb48fe ("backing_dev: remove current->backing_dev_info")
from the mm tree and commit:
3564004ccddf ("btrfs: determine synchronous writers from bio or writeback control")
from the btrfs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/btrfs/file.c
index ecd43ab66fa6,f53b7b75092d..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@@ -1683,9 -1682,7 +1679,6 @@@ ssize_t btrfs_do_write_iter(struct kioc
num_written = num_sync;
}
- if (sync)
- atomic_dec(&inode->sync_writers);
-
- current->backing_dev_info = NULL;
return num_written;
}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists