[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxh_Q7o_Ln1YAJdNyoXuid+p+SBAkmXVUfDbd-sZHX-qOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 08:38:22 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: Danila Chernetsov <listdansp@...l.ru>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Leah Rumancik <lrumancik@...gle.com>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/1] xfs: verify buffer contents when we skip log replay
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 8:20 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:44:39PM +0000, Danila Chernetsov wrote:
> > From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
> >
> > commit 22ed903eee23a5b174e240f1cdfa9acf393a5210 upstream.
> >
> > syzbot detected a crash during log recovery:
>
> XFS patches for stable come from the XFS maintainers, so please work
> with them if you feel any specific patch is missing from a stable tree.
>
Danila,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
I've tested this fix for 6.1.y and Leah will test it for 5.15.y
thereafter I will test and post it for 5.10.y.
FYI, the MAINTAINERS file in each LTS kernel has an extra
xfs maintainer listed for backporting fixes for that LTS, however
6.1.y is still waiting for an assigned backporting maintainer.
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists