[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230604061421.3787649-2-alexeymin@postmarketos.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:14:20 +0300
From: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Add support for SDM630/636/660
Snapdragon 630/660 modem subsystem is similar to one in MSM8998
and can almost reuse it's reset sequence.
Downstream sources call this q6v5 version "qdsp6v62-1-5" and its
code path has additional checks for QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK
status [2].
Inspiration is taken from Konrad Dybcio's work in [1], but reworked
to use common code path with MSM8996/8998, instead of completely
separate "if" block for SDM660.
[1] https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/7dd6dd9b936dc8d6c1f1abe299e5b065c33741e8
[2] https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource/blob/lavender-q-oss/drivers/soc/qcom/pil-q6v5.c#L393
Co-developed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
---
In his commit Konrad mentions that modem was unstable, but I don't
observe such behaviour on my device. Modem does not restart by itself,
and I could successfully enable ath10k Wi-Fi with this (and it was
also stable).
Also worth saying that in my initial tests just using qcom,msm8998-mss-pil
as-is, without separate resource struct and separate code paths for
SDM660, was also working fine. So I'm not sure if separate struct and
code path is even needed for sdm660.
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index 8e15e4f85de13..e270fc4798766 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
#define QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x0B0
#define QDSP6V6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x034
#define QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC 0x110
+#define QDSP6V62SS_BHS_STATUS 0x0C4
/* AXI Halt Register Offsets */
#define AXI_HALTREQ_REG 0x0
@@ -123,6 +124,7 @@
#define QDSP6v56_CLAMP_QMC_MEM BIT(22)
#define QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR 0x0038
#define QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL 0x20
+#define QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK BIT(0)
/* QDSP6v65 parameters */
#define QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR 0x20
@@ -130,6 +132,7 @@
#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CORE_START 0x400
#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CMD 0x404
#define BOOT_FSM_TIMEOUT 10000
+#define BHS_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS 200
struct reg_info {
struct regulator *reg;
@@ -250,6 +253,7 @@ enum {
MSS_MSM8998,
MSS_SC7180,
MSS_SC7280,
+ MSS_SDM660,
MSS_SDM845,
};
@@ -700,7 +704,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
} else if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8909 ||
qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
- qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998) {
+ qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998 ||
+ qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {
if (qproc->version != MSS_MSM8909 &&
qproc->version != MSS_MSM8953)
@@ -734,6 +739,19 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
val |= readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
udelay(1);
+ if (qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {
+ for (i = BHS_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS; i > 0; i--) {
+ if (readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6V62SS_BHS_STATUS)
+ & QDSP6v55_BHS_EN_REST_ACK)
+ break;
+ udelay(1);
+ }
+ if (!i) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "BHS_EN_REST_ACK not set!\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Put LDO in bypass mode */
val |= QDSP6v56_LDO_BYP;
writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
@@ -756,7 +774,7 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
i = 19;
} else {
- /* MSS_MSM8998 */
+ /* MSS_MSM8998, MSS_SDM660 */
mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6V6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
i = 28;
}
@@ -2193,6 +2211,37 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sc7280_mss = {
.version = MSS_SC7280,
};
+static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm660_mss = {
+ .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
+ .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "xo",
+ "qdss",
+ "mem",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .active_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "iface",
+ "bus",
+ "gpll0_mss",
+ "mnoc_axi",
+ "snoc_axi",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
+ "cx",
+ "mx",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .need_mem_protection = true,
+ .has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_mba_logs = false,
+ .has_spare_reg = false,
+ .has_qaccept_regs = false,
+ .has_ext_cntl_regs = false,
+ .has_vq6 = false,
+ .version = MSS_SDM660,
+};
+
static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss = {
.hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
.proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
@@ -2475,6 +2524,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id q6v5_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil", .data = &msm8998_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mss-pil", .data = &sc7180_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-mss-pil", .data = &sc7280_mss},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-mss-pil", .data = &sdm660_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mss-pil", .data = &sdm845_mss},
{ },
};
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists