linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/1] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement USXGMII mode for mv88e6393x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a5491e-6697-48d3-94fe-aa2c6f5ab129@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 18:49:12 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Michal Smulski <michal.smulski@...a.com>
Cc:     "msmulski2@...il.com" <msmulski2@...il.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "olteanv@...il.com" <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "simon.horman@...igine.com" <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        "kabel@...nel.org" <kabel@...nel.org>,
        "ioana.ciornei@....com" <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/1] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement USXGMII
 mode for mv88e6393x

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:32:03PM +0000, Michal Smulski wrote:
> Andrew,
> 

> I will remove this line and resend v7. This was a mistake on my
> part. However, could you clarify on what is the best way to let
> reviewers know what changed between different version of the same
> patch? It seemed to me that changlist should not be part of the git
> commit message and hence I decided to add 'cover-letter' email for
> each new version of the patch so that it would not be part of the
> applied patch to net-next git repo (but it would also be easy to
> match changelist email with patch email to people reviewing latest
> patch)

Some people think the history is actually useful, it shows what has
been considered etc and the patch matured.

However, anything text after the --- marker in a patch will get
discarded by git am when the patch is merged. So you can place the
history there.

	Andrew