[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9d126711c7498b199b3e6f5cf48ca60ffb9df54c.1685983270.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 18:01:33 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: will@...nel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
bwicaksono@...dia.com, ilkka@...amperecomputing.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf/arm_cspmu: Clean up ACPI dependency
Build-wise, the ACPI dependency consists of only a couple of things
which could probably stand being factored out into ACPI helpers anyway.
However for the immediate concern of working towards Devicetree support
here, it's easy enough to make a few tweaks to contain the affected code
locally, such that we can relax the Kconfig dependency.
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Reviewed-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig | 3 +--
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
index 0b316fe69a45..25d25ded0983 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
config ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
tristate "ARM Coresight Architecture PMU"
- depends on ARM64 && ACPI
- depends on ACPI_APMT || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
help
Provides support for performance monitoring unit (PMU) devices
based on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture. Note that this PMU
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index 72dc7a9e1ca8..3b91115c376d 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <acpi/processor.h>
#include "arm_cspmu.h"
#include "nvidia_cspmu.h"
@@ -1075,6 +1074,9 @@ static int arm_cspmu_request_irq(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
return 0;
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
+#include <acpi/processor.h>
+
static inline int arm_cspmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
{
u32 acpi_uid;
@@ -1099,7 +1101,7 @@ static inline int arm_cspmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
return -ENODEV;
}
-static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+static int arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
{
struct device *dev;
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
@@ -1135,6 +1137,17 @@ static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
return 0;
}
+#else
+static int arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+#endif
+
+static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ return arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(cspmu);
+}
static int arm_cspmu_register_pmu(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
{
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists