[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH4a1l1pfG8ewo3v@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:26:46 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
hsinweih@....edu, jakub@...udflare.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
syzbot+49f6cef45247ff249498@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yanan@...wei.com,
wuchangye@...wei.com, xiesongyang@...wei.com,
kongweibin2@...wei.com, zhangmingyi5@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf:fix use empty function pointers in ringbuf_poll
On 06/05, Xin Liu wrote:
> From: zhangmingyi <zhangmingyi5@...wei.com>
>
> The sample_cb of the ring_buffer__new interface can transfer NULL. However,
> the system does not check whether sample_cb is NULL during
> ring_buffer__poll, null pointer is used.
What is the point of calling ring_buffer__new with sample_cb == NULL?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists