linux-kernel - Re: The robot is broken (was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] USB: serial: return errors from break handling)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZH2FmTrOkQI8FA__@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 08:50:01 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The robot is broken (was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] USB: serial: return
 errors from break handling)

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:30:58PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:

> > The robot currently appears to be broken though as this report was never
> > sent to me or the relevant mailing lists (and I just happened to see it
> > by chance).
> 
> Thanks a lot Johan for checking this. For now, the bot has 2 similar mailing lists,
> one is oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, which contains the high confidence report that
> is sent directly to author and related CC. Another one is this oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev,
> that we will send low confidence issues here and they will only be really reported
> out after manual check. So we can reduce false positives.

Ah, thanks for the explanation and sorry about the noise.

Johan