[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fs768htd.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 09:54:54 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...sol.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/6] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper
function
On Sun, Jun 04 2023 at 07:02, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> On 3.6.2023 23.07, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Wake up AP by INIT, INIT, STARTUP sequence.
>> + */
>> +static int wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
>> + int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
>> +
>> + preempt_disable();
>
> This seems like an unbalanced preempt disable..
Right. I screwed up a rebase completely....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists