[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f24981d8-e384-e02e-8257-4b03b37e6c0e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:17:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECT] perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code
On 05/06/2023 12:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:27:31AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> That said; given that this commit has been tagged twice now, I suppose I
>> should go revert it and we'll try again after a more thorough audit.
>
> I'll go queue this then...
>
> ---
> Subject: perf: Re-instate the linear PMU search
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 5 11:42:39 CEST 2023
>
> Full revert of commit 9551fbb64d09 ("perf/core: Remove pmu linear
> searching code").
>
> Some architectures (notably arm/arm64) still relied on the linear
> search in order to find the PMU that consumes
> PERF_TYPE_{HARDWARE,HW_CACHE,RAW}.
>
> This will need a more thorought audit and clean.
>
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Thanks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists