linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/msm/dp: set self refresh aware based on PSR support"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:18:52 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/msm/dp: set self refresh aware based on PSR
 support"

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:05:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 13:02, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Virtual terminals are still broken with 6.4-rc5 on the Lenovo ThinkPad
> > X13s two weeks after I reported this, and there has been no indication
> > of any progress in the other related thread:
> >
> >         https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZHYPHnWoDbXB-fqe@hovoldconsulting.com
> >
> > Seems like it is time to merge this revert to get this sorted.
> >
> > Rob, Abhinav, Dmitry, can either of you merge this one and get it into
> > 6.4-rc6?
> 
> Rob sent the pull request few hours ago, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAF6AEGuHujkFjRa6ys36Uyh0KUr4Hd16u1EMqJo8tOZ3ifVubQ@mail.gmail.com/

Ok, so you guys went with the module parameter hack. Whatever. As long
as the regression is finally fixed.

Next time, some visibility into your process would be appreciated to
avoid unnecessary work.

Johan