lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH22jMTq6fi8iBpe@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:18:52 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/msm/dp: set self refresh aware based on PSR
 support"

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:05:36PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 13:02, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Virtual terminals are still broken with 6.4-rc5 on the Lenovo ThinkPad
> > X13s two weeks after I reported this, and there has been no indication
> > of any progress in the other related thread:
> >
> >         https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZHYPHnWoDbXB-fqe@hovoldconsulting.com
> >
> > Seems like it is time to merge this revert to get this sorted.
> >
> > Rob, Abhinav, Dmitry, can either of you merge this one and get it into
> > 6.4-rc6?
> 
> Rob sent the pull request few hours ago, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAF6AEGuHujkFjRa6ys36Uyh0KUr4Hd16u1EMqJo8tOZ3ifVubQ@mail.gmail.com/

Ok, so you guys went with the module parameter hack. Whatever. As long
as the regression is finally fixed.

Next time, some visibility into your process would be appreciated to
avoid unnecessary work.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ