[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230605105332.245553-1-falcon@tinylab.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 18:53:32 +0800
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
To: w@....eu
Cc: arnd@...db.de, falcon@...ylab.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, thomas@...ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftests/nolibc: fix up and improve test report
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:47:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > Thanks very much for your merge of the v3 generic part1 of rv32, just
> > tested your latest 20230604-nolibc-rv32+stkp6 branch, everything work
> > well except a trivial test report regression on the 'run' target.
> (...)
>
> I've squashed your fix into the pending patch and pushed branch
> 20230605-nolibc-rv32+stkp7. I have only tested userland (I really
> need to leave now, no time for a kernel build).
>
Just did kernel build + nolibc test for arm, aarch64 and rv64, no regressions
found.
> Zhangjin and Thomas, now that your last two fixes are merged, I'm
> assuming that Paul can take the branch any time. If you're seeing a
> showstopper that needs to be fixed, please let him know, and I'll
> deal with it once I'm connected again, but please no more attempts
> to further improve that branch for now (i.e. consider it merged for
> any future work so that we can finally settle on something).
Ok, let's work on v6.6 ;-)
Best regards,
Zhangjin
>
> Thanks!
> Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists