[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH3GW9Y+id4EelU9@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:26:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Cc: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Michael Peters <mpeters@...eddedts.com>,
Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedts.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 28/43] input: keypad: ep93xx: add DT support for
Cirrus EP93xx
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 10:14:52PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 19:54 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 08:45:33AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
...
> > > +static int ep93xx_keypad_flags;
> > > +module_param(ep93xx_keypad_flags, int, 0);
> > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ep93xx_keypad_flags, "EP93XX keypad flags.");
> >
> > Why? This pretty much looks like missing DT description.
>
> From other patches from this series, i learned NOT to add new DT
> entities, not even with vendor prefix, no way!
>
> May be i missing something of course...
We do not add module parameters to a new code either. So this will be
a dead end.
...
> Was never used in different ways than initializing all to zeroes
> including flags since 2.6 (didn't look before through), so i would
> prefer to drop this completely than moving it into device tree.
This sounds the best!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists