linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] selftests/mm: fix two -Wformat-security warnings in uffd builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3a3b21e-df1c-08bc-2860-8a53134ec172@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:37:04 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] selftests/mm: fix two -Wformat-security warnings
 in uffd builds

On 03.06.23 04:15, John Hubbard wrote:
> The uffd tests generate two compile time warnings from clang's
> -Wformat-security setting. These trigger at the call sites for
> uffd_test_start() and uffd_test_skip().
> 
> 1) Fix the uffd_test_start() issue by removing the intermediate
> test_name variable (thanks to David Hildenbrand for showing how to do
> this).
> 
> 2) Fix the uffd_test_skip() issue by observing that there is no need for
> a macro and a variable args approach, because all callers of
> uffd_test_skip() pass in a simple char* string, without any format
> specifiers. So just change uffd_test_skip() into a regular C function.
> 
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 16 ++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> index 269c86768a02..04d91f144d1c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> @@ -109,12 +109,11 @@ static void uffd_test_pass(void)
>   		ksft_inc_fail_cnt();		\
>   	} while (0)
>   
> -#define  uffd_test_skip(...)  do {		\
> -		printf("skipped [reason: ");	\
> -		printf(__VA_ARGS__);		\
> -		printf("]\n");			\
> -		ksft_inc_xskip_cnt();		\
> -	} while (0)
> +static void uffd_test_skip(const char *message)
> +{
> +	printf("skipped [reason: %s]\n", message);
> +	ksft_inc_xskip_cnt();
> +}
>   
>   /*
>    * Returns 1 if specific userfaultfd supported, 0 otherwise.  Note, we'll
> @@ -1149,7 +1148,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	uffd_test_case_t *test;
>   	mem_type_t *mem_type;
>   	uffd_test_args_t args;
> -	char test_name[128];
>   	const char *errmsg;
>   	int has_uffd, opt;
>   	int i, j;
> @@ -1192,10 +1190,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   			mem_type = &mem_types[j];
>   			if (!(test->mem_targets & mem_type->mem_flag))
>   				continue;
> -			snprintf(test_name, sizeof(test_name),
> -				 "%s on %s", test->name, mem_type->name);
>   
> -			uffd_test_start(test_name);
> +			uffd_test_start("%s on %s", test->name, mem_type->name);
>   			if (!uffd_feature_supported(test)) {
>   				uffd_test_skip("feature missing");
>   				continue;

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb