[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH3UIMe4DyCicPYQ@mail.minyard.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 07:25:04 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Craig Shelley <craig@...rotron.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Break doesn't work on a CP2105
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:15:28AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 03:11:43PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 02:17:16PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > > I just verified break signalling on the first port of my CP2105 using a
> > > logic analyser and everything seems to work as expected.
> > >
> > > There's also no mention of any issue with break in the errata.
> > >
> > > Could you check which firmware revision you have by enabling debugging
> > > and reconnecting the device?
>
> > [ 4.253869] usb 2-1.2: new full-speed USB device number 3 using ehci-pci
> > [ 4.342570] usb 2-1.2: New USB device found, idVendor=10c4, idProduct=ea70, bcdDevice= 1.00
> > [ 4.350939] usb 2-1.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=5
> > [ 4.358259] usb 2-1.2: Product: CP2105 Dual USB to UART Bridge Controller
> > [ 4.365052] usb 2-1.2: Manufacturer: Silicon Labs
> > [ 4.369765] usb 2-1.2: SerialNumber: 01070456
> > [ 4.374925] cp210x 2-1.2:1.0: cp210x converter detected
> > [ 4.381086] cp210x 2-1.2:1.0: cp210x_get_fw_version - 1.18.1
> > [ 4.386915] usb 2-1.2: cp210x converter now attached to ttyUSB0
> > [ 4.393529] cp210x 2-1.2:1.1: cp210x converter detected
> > [ 4.399835] cp210x 2-1.2:1.1: cp210x_get_fw_version - 1.18.1
> > [ 4.405657] usb 2-1.2: cp210x converter now attached to ttyUSB1
>
> So we have the same firmware revision.
>
> > This is an embedded reference board, I guess there is some probability
> > that this is just broken on this board, though I'm not quite sure how.
>
> Is the port accessible somehow so that you could hook up a scope or
> logic analyser? Or is that what you did already when you mentioned
> seeing garbage sent after 2.5 seconds?
I didn't hook up a scope, but I did set the baud to a really low rate
and send a character that was all zeros and got a break on the other
end. It wasn't garbage I was seeing after 2.5 seconds, it was basically
a small number of 0 bits, it appeared.
I have a scope that I can capture with, but this is all embedded onto a
board. I looked at the schematic and there are some resistors that I
could hook to, perhaps. I'll see what I can do, but I don't have
surface mount stuff to be able to attach easily.
Thank you,
-corey
>
> That last bit seems to match the behaviour I see with the second, SCI
> port, where the last character sent is resent when trying to signal a
> break.
>
> Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists