[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b38bd01c-dbaa-440d-93ae-b1b772f8e8e1@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:41:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: msmulski2@...il.com
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, simon.horman@...igine.com,
kabel@...nel.org, ioana.ciornei@....com,
Michal Smulski <michal.smulski@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/1] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement USXGMII
mode for mv88e6393x
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 10:39:53PM -0700, msmulski2@...il.com wrote:
> From: Michal Smulski <michal.smulski@...a.com>
>
> Changelist:
> * do not enable USXGMII for 6361 chips
> * track state->an_complete with state->link
>
> *** BLURB HERE ***
Hi Michal
Please remember to remove the *** BLURB HERE ***. What often happens
is that a branch is created for a patchset, and then the branch is
merged and the content of patch 0/X is used as the merge commit
message. So this can end up in the git history.
For a single patch, you are not required to have a patch 0/X.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists