[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3f7c08f-272a-5abb-da78-568c408f40de@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 15:04:34 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <maz@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <sre@...nel.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
<sudeep.holla@....com>, <balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com>,
<mihai.sain@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com>, <cristian.birsan@...rochip.com>,
<durai.manickamkr@...rochip.com>, <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>,
<dharma.b@...rochip.com>, <nayabbasha.sayed@...rochip.com>,
<balakrishnan.s@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/21] power: reset: at91-poweroff: lookup for proper pmc
dt node for sam9x7
On 05/06/2023 at 08:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/06/2023 22:02, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Use sam9x7 pmc's compatible to lookup for in the SHDWC driver
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
>> index d8ecffe72f16..d0f29b99f25e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
>> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_pmc_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc" },
>> { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-pmc" },
>> { .compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-pmc" },
>> + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x7-pmc" },
>
> Why do you need new entry if these are compatible?
Yes, PMC is very specific to a SoC silicon. As we must look for it in
the shutdown controller, I think we need a new entry here.
Best regards,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists