[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rcyhwvk.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 15:17:03 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 2/3] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Fix endian conversions
On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 14:50:54 +0200,
Stefan Binding wrote:
>
> Hi Takashi,
>
> On 05/06/2023 08:21, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 May 2023 15:59:54 +0200,
> > Stefan Binding wrote:
> >> @@ -379,10 +379,10 @@ static int cs35l41_save_calibration(struct cs35l41_hda *cs35l41)
> >> /* Calibration can only be applied
> >> whilst the DSP is not running */
> >> ret = cs35l41_apply_calibration(cs35l41,
> >> - cpu_to_be32(cl->calAmbient),
> >> - cpu_to_be32(cl->calR),
> >> - cpu_to_be32(cl->calStatus),
> >> - cpu_to_be32(cl->calR + 1));
> >> + (__be32)cpu_to_be32(cl->calAmbient),
> >> + (__be32)cpu_to_be32(cl->calR),
> >> + (__be32)cpu_to_be32(cl->calStatus),
> >> + (__be32)cpu_to_be32(cl->calR + 1));
> > Do we really need those cast? Even if yes, it must be with __force
> > prefix for the endian cast in general.
>
> These casts were added because we found some warnings when we ran the
> static analyzer sparse locally.
> I think these warnings are very minor, and we can drop this patch if
> you prefer?
The warnings must be bogus, or maybe pointing to other things?
The cpu_to_be32() macro itself must return a __be32 value, hence it
makes no sense to add an extra cast .
If the static analysis still shows such a warning, it should be fixed
differently -- either fix the analyzer or fix the cpu_to_be32() macro
itself.
The changes of the argument types to __be32 are fine. I'm arguing
only about those unnecessary cast.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists