[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3051ad44-0ac3-e77b-3178-fac7cac3b3f2@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:25:30 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling()
On 31.05.2023 14:04, tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
>
> Commit-ID: c7dfd6b9122d29d0e9a4587ab470c0564d7f92ab
> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c7dfd6b9122d29d0e9a4587ab470c0564d7f92ab
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 30 May 2023 13:20:46 +02:00
> Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> CommitterDate: Tue, 30 May 2023 22:46:27 +02:00
>
> sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling()
>
> Tejun reported that when he targets workqueues towards a specific LLC
> on his Zen2 machine with 3 cores / LLC and 4 LLCs in total, he gets
> significant idle time.
>
> This is, of course, because of how select_idle_sibling() will not
> consider anything outside of the local LLC, and since all these tasks
> are short running the periodic idle load balancer is ineffective.
>
> And while it is good to keep work cache local, it is better to not
> have significant idle time. Therefore, have select_idle_sibling() try
> other LLCs inside the same node when the local one comes up empty.
>
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
This patch landed in today's linux next-20230605 as commit c5214e13ad60
("sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling()"). Unfortunately it causes
regression on my ARM 64bit Exynos5433-based TM2e test board during the
CPU hotplug tests. From time to time I get the NULL pointer dereference.
Reverting $subject on top of linux-next fixes the issue. Let me know if
I can help somehow debugging this issue. Here is a complete log (I've
intentionally kept all the stack dumps, although they don't look very
relevant...):
# for i in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[1-9]; do echo 0 >$i/online; done
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0000000000000090
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.0-rc1+ #13640 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
cpuhp/6/43 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff80000ab65598 (console_owner){..-.}-{0:0}, at:
console_flush_all+0x1ac/0x4fc
but task is already holding lock:
ffff00002836ed48 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x58/0x46c
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x88
try_to_wake_up+0x58/0x46c
default_wake_function+0x14/0x20
autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x44
__wake_up_common+0x94/0x170
__wake_up_common_lock+0x7c/0xcc
__wake_up+0x18/0x24
tty_wakeup+0x34/0x70
tty_port_default_wakeup+0x20/0x38
tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x18/0x24
uart_write_wakeup+0x18/0x28
s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars+0x20c/0x218
s3c64xx_serial_handle_irq+0x9c/0xe0
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0xb0/0x2d4
handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xb8
handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x198
generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x44
gic_handle_irq+0x44/0xc4
call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x4c
do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x84
el1_interrupt+0x34/0x64
el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
default_idle_call+0x9c/0x150
do_idle+0x230/0x294
cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x2c
rest_init+0x100/0x190
arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8
start_kernel+0x594/0x684
__primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
-> #2 (&tty->write_wait){-.-.}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x88
__wake_up_common_lock+0x5c/0xcc
__wake_up+0x18/0x24
tty_wakeup+0x34/0x70
tty_port_default_wakeup+0x20/0x38
tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x18/0x24
uart_write_wakeup+0x18/0x28
s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars+0x20c/0x218
s3c64xx_serial_handle_irq+0x9c/0xe0
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0xb0/0x2d4
handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xb8
handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x198
generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x44
gic_handle_irq+0x44/0xc4
call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x4c
do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x84
el1_interrupt+0x34/0x64
el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
default_idle_call+0x9c/0x150
do_idle+0x230/0x294
cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x2c
rest_init+0x100/0x190
arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8
start_kernel+0x594/0x684
__primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
-> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x88
s3c24xx_serial_console_write+0xfc/0x124
console_flush_all+0x208/0x4fc
console_unlock+0x5c/0x14c
vprintk_emit+0x15c/0x3b0
vprintk_default+0x38/0x44
vprintk+0xc0/0xe4
_printk+0x5c/0x84
register_console+0x1f4/0x420
uart_add_one_port+0x50c/0x53c
s3c24xx_serial_probe+0x34c/0x72c
platform_probe+0x68/0xd8
really_probe+0x148/0x2b4
__driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c
driver_probe_device+0xd8/0x160
__driver_attach+0x9c/0x1ac
bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd4
driver_attach+0x24/0x30
bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1e8
driver_register+0x60/0x128
__platform_driver_register+0x28/0x34
samsung_serial_init+0x30/0x8c
do_one_initcall+0x74/0x2f0
kernel_init_freeable+0x288/0x4d8
kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #0 (console_owner){..-.}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x13d0/0x217c
lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x310
console_flush_all+0x1f4/0x4fc
console_unlock+0x5c/0x14c
vprintk_emit+0x15c/0x3b0
vprintk_default+0x38/0x44
vprintk+0xc0/0xe4
_printk+0x5c/0x84
die_kernel_fault+0x48/0x37c
__do_kernel_fault+0xd8/0x19c
do_page_fault+0xac/0x6d8
do_translation_fault+0xac/0xb8
do_mem_abort+0x44/0x94
el1_abort+0x44/0x70
el1h_64_sync_handler+0xd8/0xe4
el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68
__bitmap_and+0x4c/0x78
select_task_rq_fair+0x724/0x1a30
try_to_wake_up+0x17c/0x46c
wake_up_process+0x18/0x24
complete+0x58/0x8c
__kthread_parkme+0x74/0xc8
kthread_parkme+0x20/0x44
smpboot_thread_fn+0x118/0x2a0
kthread+0x124/0x128
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
console_owner --> &tty->write_wait --> &p->pi_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&p->pi_lock);
lock(&tty->write_wait);
lock(&p->pi_lock);
lock(console_owner);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by cpuhp/6/43:
#0: ffff000023e68440 (&x->wait){....}-{2:2}, at: complete+0x24/0x8c
#1: ffff00002836ed48 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at:
try_to_wake_up+0x58/0x46c
#2: ffff80000abd6ac0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at:
select_task_rq_fair+0x114/0x1a30
#3: ffff80000ab65390 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
vprintk_default+0x38/0x44
#4: ffff80000ab65440 (console_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at:
console_flush_all+0x7c/0x4fc
stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 43 Comm: cpuhp/6 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc1+ #13640
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x98/0xf0
show_stack+0x18/0x24
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac
dump_stack+0x18/0x24
print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x348
check_noncircular+0x134/0x148
__lock_acquire+0x13d0/0x217c
lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x310
console_flush_all+0x1f4/0x4fc
console_unlock+0x5c/0x14c
vprintk_emit+0x15c/0x3b0
vprintk_default+0x38/0x44
vprintk+0xc0/0xe4
_printk+0x5c/0x84
die_kernel_fault+0x48/0x37c
__do_kernel_fault+0xd8/0x19c
do_page_fault+0xac/0x6d8
do_translation_fault+0xac/0xb8
do_mem_abort+0x44/0x94
el1_abort+0x44/0x70
el1h_64_sync_handler+0xd8/0xe4
el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68
__bitmap_and+0x4c/0x78
select_task_rq_fair+0x724/0x1a30
try_to_wake_up+0x17c/0x46c
wake_up_process+0x18/0x24
complete+0x58/0x8c
__kthread_parkme+0x74/0xc8
kthread_parkme+0x20/0x44
smpboot_thread_fn+0x118/0x2a0
kthread+0x124/0x128
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000006
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
CM = 0, WnR = 0
user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000002783e000
[0000000000000090] pgd=080000002738f003, p4d=080000002738f003,
pud=0800000027a24003, pmd=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: brcmfmac_wcc cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_conservative
brcmfmac brcmutil cfg80211 crct10dif_ce hci_uart btqca btbcm bluetooth
s5p_jpeg exynos_gsc s3fwrn5_i2c s3fwrn5 s5p_mfc nci v4l2_mem2mem
ecdh_generic nfc ecc videobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops
videobuf2_v4l2 videodev rfkill panfrost videobuf2_common
drm_shmem_helper gpu_sched mc ip_tables x_tables ipv6
CPU: 6 PID: 43 Comm: cpuhp/6 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc1+ #13640
Hardware name: Samsung TM2E board (DT)
pstate: 000000c5 (nzcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : __bitmap_and+0x4c/0x78
lr : select_idle_cpu+0x64/0x450
sp : ffff80000bd83b50
x29: ffff80000bd83b50 x28: ffff80000a152ad8 x27: ffff00002836e500
x26: ffff00002814f600 x25: ffff80000ab43e78 x24: 0000000000000000
x23: ffff80000ab3f000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff80000ab43e78
x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffff8000099ac098
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000067 x15: 0000000000000001
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000000000d8 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff80000b7c6e90 x9 : 0000000000000000
x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000
x5 : 0000000000000020 x4 : 00000000000000ff x3 : 00000000fffffff8
x2 : ffff00002836e7e0 x1 : 0000000000000090 x0 : ffff0000d5fc2ad8
Call trace:
__bitmap_and+0x4c/0x78
select_task_rq_fair+0x724/0x1a30
try_to_wake_up+0x17c/0x46c
wake_up_process+0x18/0x24
complete+0x58/0x8c
__kthread_parkme+0x74/0xc8
kthread_parkme+0x20/0x44
smpboot_thread_fn+0x118/0x2a0
kthread+0x124/0x128
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: 2a0803e8 4b0303e3 92800004 9ac32484 (f8687823)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: disabled
CPU features: 0x8c0004,1c780800,0000421b
Memory Limit: none
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception ]---
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 48b6f0c..0172458 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7028,6 +7028,38 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
> }
>
> /*
> + * For the multiple-LLC per node case, make sure to try the other LLC's if the
> + * local LLC comes up empty.
> + */
> +static int
> +select_idle_node(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> +{
> + struct sched_domain *parent = sd->parent;
> + struct sched_group *sg;
> +
> + /* Make sure to not cross nodes. */
> + if (!parent || parent->flags & SD_NUMA)
> + return -1;
> +
> + sg = parent->groups;
> + do {
> + int cpu = cpumask_first(sched_group_span(sg));
> + struct sched_domain *sd_child;
> +
> + sd_child = per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu);
> + if (sd_child != sd) {
> + int i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd_child, test_idle_cores(cpu), cpu);
> + if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> + sg = sg->next;
> + } while (sg != parent->groups);
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Scan the asym_capacity domain for idle CPUs; pick the first idle one on which
> * the task fits. If no CPU is big enough, but there are idle ones, try to
> * maximize capacity.
> @@ -7199,6 +7231,12 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
> if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> return i;
>
> + if (sched_feat(SIS_NODE)) {
> + i = select_idle_node(p, sd, target);
> + if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> return target;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
> index ee7f23c..9e390eb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/features.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
> */
> SCHED_FEAT(SIS_PROP, false)
> SCHED_FEAT(SIS_UTIL, true)
> +SCHED_FEAT(SIS_NODE, true)
>
> /*
> * Issue a WARN when we do multiple update_rq_clock() calls
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists