[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH4CnJlpBMxEEwPW@tpad>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:43:24 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/vmstat: do not refresh stats for nohz_full CPUs
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:59:57AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-06-23 15:58:00, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > The interruption caused by queueing work on nohz_full CPUs
> > is undesirable for certain aplications.
>
> This is not a proper changelog. I am not going to write a changelog for
> you this time. Please explain why this is really needed and why this
> approach is desired.
> E.g. why don't you prevent userspace from
> refreshing stats if interference is not desirable.
Michal,
Can you please check if the following looks better, as
a changelog? thanks
---
schedule_work_on API uses the workqueue mechanism to
queue a work item on a queue. A kernel thread, which
runs on the target CPU, executes those work items.
Therefore, when using the schedule_work_on API,
it is necessary for the kworker kernel thread to
be scheduled in, for the work function to be executed.
Time sensitive applications such as SoftPLCs
(https://tum-esi.github.io/publications-list/PDF/2022-ETFA-How_Real_Time_Are_Virtual_PLCs.pdf),
have their response times affected by such interruptions.
The /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh file was originally introduced by
commit 52b6f46bc163eef17ecba4cd552beeafe2b24453
Author: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Date: Thu May 19 17:12:50 2016 -0700
mm: /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh to force vmstat update
Provide /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh to force an immediate update of
per-cpu into global vmstats: useful to avoid a sleep(2) or whatever
before checking counts when testing. Originally added to work around a
bug which left counts stranded indefinitely on a cpu going idle (an
inaccuracy magnified when small below-batch numbers represent "huge"
amounts of memory), but I believe that bug is now fixed: nonetheless,
this is still a useful knob.
Other than the potential interruption to a time sensitive application,
if using SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR priority on the isolated CPU, then
system hangs can occur:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978688
To avoid the problems above, do not schedule the work to synchronize
per-CPU mm counters on isolated CPUs. Given the possibility for
breaking existing userspace applications, avoid changing
behaviour of access to /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh, such as
returning errors to userspace.
---
> Also would it make some sense to reduce flushing to cpumask
> of the calling process? (certainly a daring thought but have
> you even considered it?)
Fail to see the point here ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists