[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 19:40:40 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abe Kohandel <abe.kohandel@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: dw: Add compatible for Intel Mount Evans SoC
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 05:24:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 07:54:00 -0700, Abe Kohandel wrote:
> > The Intel Mount Evans SoC's Integrated Management Complex has a DW
> > apb_ssi_v4.02a controller. This series adds support for this controller.
> >
> > No SoC level chip select override is provided and as such no DMA
> > configuration is done for the controller.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Abe
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Mark, next time please wait at least for a few days before applying.
Give me a chance to review.)
* In this case I have had a question regarding the in-code comment
which may have been needed to be fixed a bit.
-Serge(y)
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1/2] spi: dw: Add compatible for Intel Mount Evans SoC
> commit: 0760d5d0e9f0c0e2200a0323a61d1995bb745dee
> [2/2] dt-bindings: spi: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Add compatible for Intel Mount Evans SoC
> commit: 7bac98a338d63efb0b44ce4b79d53838491f00df
>
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
>
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
>
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
>
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists