[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:10:22 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/mm: gup_longterm: new functional test
for FOLL_LONGTERM
On 06.06.23 08:23, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 5/19/23 03:27, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> ...
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> index 23af4633f0f4..95acb099315e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ LDLIBS = -lrt -lpthread
>>
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS = cow
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS += compaction_test
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += gup_longterm
>
> Hi David,
>
> Peter Xu just pointed out that we need a .gitignore entry for
> gup_longterm [1]. That logically belongs in this patch, I think.
Yes, although I don't care if it's in a follow-up patch (we're talking
testcases after all).
@Andrew can you include that hunk in that patch or do you want a resend?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists