linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 10:20:11 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:49:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index a74f41c7280f,4a2ab3f366de..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@@ -2662,35 -2641,17 +2662,46 @@@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilit
>   		.cpu_enable = cpu_enable_dit,
>   		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, DIT, IMP)
>   	},
>  +	{
>  +		.desc = "Memory Copy and Memory Set instructions",
>  +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_MOPS,
>  +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
>  +		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
>  +		.cpu_enable = cpu_enable_mops,
>  +		ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, MOPS, IMP)
>  +	},
>  +	{
>  +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_TCR2,
>  +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
>  +		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1,
>  +		.sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
>  +		.field_pos = ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_TCRX_SHIFT,
>  +		.field_width = 4,
>  +		.min_field_value = ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_TCRX_IMP,
>  +		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
>  +	},
>  +	{
>  +		.desc = "Stage-1 Permission Indirection Extension (S1PIE)",
>  +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_S1PIE,
>  +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
>  +		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1,
>  +		.sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
>  +		.field_pos = ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1PIE_SHIFT,
>  +		.field_width = 4,
>  +		.min_field_value = ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1PIE_IMP,
>  +		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
>  +	},
> + 	{
> + 		.desc = "Enhanced Virtualization Traps",
> + 		.capability = ARM64_HAS_EVT,
> + 		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
> + 		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1,
> + 		.sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
> + 		.field_pos = ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1_EVT_SHIFT,
> + 		.field_width = 4,
> + 		.min_field_value = ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1_EVT_IMP,
> + 		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> + 	},
>   	{},
>   };

Thanks Stephen. It looks fine.

-- 
Catalin