[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230607165600.535c8530@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:56:00 +0200
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ASoC: codecs: Add support for the generic IIO
auxiliary devices
Hi Andy,
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:34:22 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
...
> > >
> > > Btw, can you avoid using OF APIs? It's better to have device property/fwnode
> > > API to be used from day 1.
> >
> > Hum, this comment was raised in the previous iteration
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230501162456.3448c494@jic23-huawei/
> >
> > I didn't find any equivalent to of_property_read_u32_index() in the
> > device_property_read_*() function family.
> > I mean I did find anything available to get a value from an array using an index.
>
> This is done by reading the entire array at once and then parsing as
> you wish in the code, device_property_read_u32_array() is for that.
>
> > In the previous iteration it was concluded that keeping OF APIs in this series
> > seemed "reasonable".
>
> Maybe, but consider the above.
I see.
Will switch to device_property_*() family in the next iteration.
Thanks,
Hervé
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists