lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6d96280-e222-1aaa-4e07-5fc4f0cde866@sberdevices.ru>
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2023 18:21:50 +0300
From:   Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC:     Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        <oxffffaa@...il.com>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: nand: meson: Fix 'nand-rb' property



On 07.06.2023 18:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/06/2023 16:55, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>> The bindings and your driver internal representation are two different
>>>>> things. Anyway, as mentioned above, wiring the RB line to one die and
>>>>> not the other would be valid hardware design and would require the rb
>>>>> property to be in the chip node. Please perform a per-chip property read
>>>>> in the driver as well.
>>>>
>>>> Done, I resend both patches (bindings + driver update) as a single patchset. Your review comments
>>>> for driver code were also fixed.
>>>
>>> No, please send new version, not the same. New version means with fixed
>>> comments and with patch changelog.
>>
>> Sorry, Yes, I mean new version, here it is:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230607145026.2899547-1-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru/
>>
>> There I fixed bindings and tested it.
> 
> I still see v1 and there is no changelog. So it's the same?

No, v1 is for new patchset from the link above. Both patches (bindings and driver) are updated there.
I attached changelog here as reply for cover letter of the patchset:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/a1e048aa-ec64-bd0b-aa17-e3e9bdf18090@sberdevices.ru/

Thanks, Arseniy

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ