[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1f6322a-eb27-3a3c-5d96-f0601c004a8d@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 08:57:09 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
len.brown@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
chao.gao@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
bagasdotme@...il.com, sagis@...gle.com, imammedo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/20] x86/virt/tdx: Add placeholder to construct
TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions
On 6/4/23 07:27, Kai Huang wrote:
> +struct tdmr_info_list {
> + void *tdmrs; /* Flexible array to hold 'tdmr_info's */
> + int nr_consumed_tdmrs; /* How many 'tdmr_info's are in use */
I'm looking back here after seeing the weird cast in the next patch.
Why is this a void* instead of a _real_ type?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists