[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230607140001.6685b0a058511f125a005da4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 14:00:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Junxiao Chang <junxiao.chang@...el.com>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...e.com,
jmarchan@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Dongwon Kim <dongwon.kim@...el.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix hugetlb page unmap count balance issue
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:53:10 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > BUGs aren't good. Can we please find a way to push this along?
> >
> > Have we heard anything from any udmabuf people?
> >
>
> I have not heard anything. When this issue popped up, it took me by surprise.
>
> udmabuf maintainer (Gerd Hoffmann), the people who added hugetlb support and
> the list where udmabuf was developed (dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org) have
> been on cc.
Maybe Greg can suggest a way forward.
> My 'gut reaction' would be to remove hugetlb support from udmabuf. From a
> quick look, if we really want this support then there will need to be some
> API changes. For example UDMABUF_CREATE should be hugetlb page aligned
> and a multiple of hugetlb page size if using a hugetlb mapping.
>
> It would be good to know about users of the driver.
So disabling "hugetlb=on" (and adding an explanatory printk) would
suffice for now?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists