lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12219954.O9o76ZdvQC@z3ntu.xyz>
Date:   Wed, 07 Jun 2023 23:00:00 +0200
From:   Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Jeykumar Sankaran <quic_jeykumar@...cinc.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for MSM8226

On Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2023 21:46:31 CEST Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> On 6/1/2023 10:00 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > MSM8226 uses a modified PLL lock sequence compared to MSM8974, which is
> > based on the function dsi_pll_enable_seq_m in the msm-3.10 kernel.
> > 
> > Worth noting that the msm-3.10 downstream kernel also will try other
> > sequences in case this one doesn't work, but during testing it has shown
> > 
> > that the _m sequence succeeds first time also:
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[0] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_m,
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[1] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_m,
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[2] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_d,
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[3] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_d,
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[4] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_f1,
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[5] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_c,
> >    .pll_enable_seqs[6] = dsi_pll_enable_seq_e,
> > 
> > We may need to expand this in the future.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> > ---
> > 
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c      |  2 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h      |  3 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_28nm.c | 97
> >   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 1
> >   deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c index bb09cbe8ff86..9d5795c58a98
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> > @@ -541,6 +541,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_phy_dt_match[] =
> > {
> > 
> >   	  .data = &dsi_phy_28nm_hpm_famb_cfgs },
> >   	
> >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-28nm-lp",
> >   	
> >   	  .data = &dsi_phy_28nm_lp_cfgs },
> > 
> > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-28nm-8226",
> > +	  .data = &dsi_phy_28nm_8226_cfgs },
> > 
> >   #endif
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI_20NM_PHY
> >   
> >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-20nm",
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h index 7137a17ae523..8b640d174785
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> > @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg {
> > 
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_hpm_cfgs;
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_hpm_famb_cfgs;
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_lp_cfgs;
> > 
> > -extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_20nm_cfgs;
> > +extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_8226_cfgs;
> > 
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_8960_cfgs;
> > 
> > +extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_20nm_cfgs;
> > 
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_cfgs;
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_660_cfgs;
> >   extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_2290_cfgs;
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_28nm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_28nm.c index
> > 4c1bf55c5f38..ceec7bb87bf1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_28nm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_28nm.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> > 
> >   /* v2.0.0 28nm LP implementation */
> >   #define DSI_PHY_28NM_QUIRK_PHY_LP	BIT(0)
> > 
> > +#define DSI_PHY_28NM_QUIRK_PHY_8226	BIT(1)
> > 
> >   #define LPFR_LUT_SIZE			10
> >   struct lpfr_cfg {
> > 
> > @@ -377,6 +378,74 @@ static int dsi_pll_28nm_vco_prepare_hpm(struct clk_hw
> > *hw)> 
> >   	return ret;
> >   
> >   }
> > 
> > +static int dsi_pll_28nm_vco_prepare_8226(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +	struct dsi_pll_28nm *pll_28nm = to_pll_28nm(hw);
> > +	struct device *dev = &pll_28nm->phy->pdev->dev;
> > +	void __iomem *base = pll_28nm->phy->pll_base;
> > +	u32 max_reads = 5, timeout_us = 100;
> > +	bool locked;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	DBG("id=%d", pll_28nm->phy->id);
> > +
> > +	pll_28nm_software_reset(pll_28nm);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * PLL power up sequence.
> > +	 * Add necessary delays recommended by hardware.
> > +	 */
> > +	dsi_phy_write(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_CAL_CFG1, 0x34);
> > +
> > +	val = DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_PWRDN_B;
> > +	dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG, val, 200);
> > +
> > +	val |= DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_PWRGEN_PWRDN_B;
> > +	dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG, val, 200);
> > +
> > +	val |= DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_LDO_PWRDN_B;
> > +	val |= DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_ENABLE;
> > +	dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG, val, 600);
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
> > +		/* DSI Uniphy lock detect setting */
> > +		dsi_phy_write(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_LKDET_CFG2, 0x0d);
> > +		dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_LKDET_CFG2,
> > +				0x0c, 100);
> > +		dsi_phy_write(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_LKDET_CFG2, 0x0d);
> > +
> > +		/* poll for PLL ready status */
> > +		locked = pll_28nm_poll_for_ready(pll_28nm,
> > +						max_reads, timeout_us);
> > +		if (locked)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		pll_28nm_software_reset(pll_28nm);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * PLL power up sequence.
> > +		 * Add necessary delays recommended by hardware.
> > +		 */
> > +		dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_PWRGEN_CFG, 0x00, 50);
> > +
> > +		val = DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_PWRDN_B;
> > +		val |= DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_PWRGEN_PWRDN_B;
> > +		dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG, val, 100);
> > +
> > +		val |= DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_LDO_PWRDN_B;
> > +		val |= DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG_PLL_ENABLE;
> > +		dsi_phy_write_udelay(base + REG_DSI_28nm_PHY_PLL_GLB_CFG, val, 600);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(!locked))
> > +		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "DSI PLL lock failed\n");
> > +	else
> > +		DBG("DSI PLL Lock success");
> > +
> > +	return locked ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Could you please share the downstream reference you used to come up with
> this sequence?

Hi, it should be this if I don't misremember.

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/refs/heads/android-msm-lenok-3.10-marshmallow-mr1-wear-release/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-mdss-8974.c#1088

Regards
Luca

> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Jeykumar S.
> 
> >   static int dsi_pll_28nm_vco_prepare_lp(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >   {
> >   
> >   	struct dsi_pll_28nm *pll_28nm = to_pll_28nm(hw);
> > 
> > @@ -471,6 +540,15 @@ static const struct clk_ops
> > clk_ops_dsi_pll_28nm_vco_lp = {> 
> >   	.is_enabled = dsi_pll_28nm_clk_is_enabled,
> >   
> >   };
> > 
> > +static const struct clk_ops clk_ops_dsi_pll_28nm_vco_8226 = {
> > +	.round_rate = dsi_pll_28nm_clk_round_rate,
> > +	.set_rate = dsi_pll_28nm_clk_set_rate,
> > +	.recalc_rate = dsi_pll_28nm_clk_recalc_rate,
> > +	.prepare = dsi_pll_28nm_vco_prepare_8226,
> > +	.unprepare = dsi_pll_28nm_vco_unprepare,
> > +	.is_enabled = dsi_pll_28nm_clk_is_enabled,
> > +};
> > +
> > 
> >   /*
> >   
> >    * PLL Callbacks
> >    */
> > 
> > @@ -536,6 +614,8 @@ static int pll_28nm_register(struct dsi_pll_28nm
> > *pll_28nm, struct clk_hw **prov> 
> >   	if (pll_28nm->phy->cfg->quirks & DSI_PHY_28NM_QUIRK_PHY_LP)
> >   	
> >   		vco_init.ops = &clk_ops_dsi_pll_28nm_vco_lp;
> > 
> > +	else if (pll_28nm->phy->cfg->quirks & DSI_PHY_28NM_QUIRK_PHY_8226)
> > +		vco_init.ops = &clk_ops_dsi_pll_28nm_vco_8226;
> > 
> >   	else
> >   	
> >   		vco_init.ops = &clk_ops_dsi_pll_28nm_vco_hpm;
> > 
> > @@ -820,3 +900,20 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_lp_cfgs = {
> > 
> >   	.quirks = DSI_PHY_28NM_QUIRK_PHY_LP,
> >   
> >   };
> > 
> > +const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_28nm_8226_cfgs = {
> > +	.has_phy_regulator = true,
> > +	.regulator_data = dsi_phy_28nm_regulators,
> > +	.num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_phy_28nm_regulators),
> > +	.ops = {
> > +		.enable = dsi_28nm_phy_enable,
> > +		.disable = dsi_28nm_phy_disable,
> > +		.pll_init = dsi_pll_28nm_init,
> > +		.save_pll_state = dsi_28nm_pll_save_state,
> > +		.restore_pll_state = dsi_28nm_pll_restore_state,
> > +	},
> > +	.min_pll_rate = VCO_MIN_RATE,
> > +	.max_pll_rate = VCO_MAX_RATE,
> > +	.io_start = { 0xfd922b00 },
> > +	.num_dsi_phy = 1,
> > +	.quirks = DSI_PHY_28NM_QUIRK_PHY_8226,
> > +};




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ