lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230607200908.315678778@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  7 Jun 2023 22:17:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
        Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 142/159] test_firmware: fix the memory leak of the allocated firmware buffer

From: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>

commit 48e156023059e57a8fc68b498439832f7600ffff upstream.

The following kernel memory leak was noticed after running
tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh:

[root@...mtodorov firmware]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
.
.
.
unreferenced object 0xffff955389bc3400 (size 1024):
  comm "test_firmware-0", pid 5451, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  GH4567..........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff962f5dec>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0
    [<ffffffff962fcca4>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240
    [<ffffffff962704de>] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0
    [<ffffffff9665b42d>] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180
    [<ffffffff95fd813b>] kthread+0x10b/0x140
    [<ffffffff95e033e9>] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
unreferenced object 0xffff9553c334b400 (size 1024):
  comm "test_firmware-1", pid 5452, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  GH4567..........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff962f5dec>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0
    [<ffffffff962fcca4>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240
    [<ffffffff962704de>] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0
    [<ffffffff9665b42d>] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180
    [<ffffffff95fd813b>] kthread+0x10b/0x140
    [<ffffffff95e033e9>] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
unreferenced object 0xffff9553c334f000 (size 1024):
  comm "test_firmware-2", pid 5453, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  GH4567..........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff962f5dec>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0
    [<ffffffff962fcca4>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240
    [<ffffffff962704de>] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0
    [<ffffffff9665b42d>] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180
    [<ffffffff95fd813b>] kthread+0x10b/0x140
    [<ffffffff95e033e9>] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
unreferenced object 0xffff9553c3348400 (size 1024):
  comm "test_firmware-3", pid 5454, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  GH4567..........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff962f5dec>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0
    [<ffffffff962fcca4>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240
    [<ffffffff962704de>] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0
    [<ffffffff9665b42d>] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180
    [<ffffffff95fd813b>] kthread+0x10b/0x140
    [<ffffffff95e033e9>] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
[root@...mtodorov firmware]#

Note that the size 1024 corresponds to the size of the test firmware
buffer. The actual number of the buffers leaked is around 70-110,
depending on the test run.

The cause of the leak is the following:

request_partial_firmware_into_buf() and request_firmware_into_buf()
provided firmware buffer isn't released on release_firmware(), we
have allocated it and we are responsible for deallocating it manually.
This is introduced in a number of context where previously only
release_firmware() was called, which was insufficient.

Reported-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
Fixes: 7feebfa487b92 ("test_firmware: add support for request_firmware_into_buf")
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
Cc: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.4
Signed-off-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-3-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 lib/test_firmware.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/lib/test_firmware.c
+++ b/lib/test_firmware.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct test_batched_req {
 	bool sent;
 	const struct firmware *fw;
 	const char *name;
+	const char *fw_buf;
 	struct completion completion;
 	struct task_struct *task;
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -143,8 +144,14 @@ static void __test_release_all_firmware(
 
 	for (i = 0; i < test_fw_config->num_requests; i++) {
 		req = &test_fw_config->reqs[i];
-		if (req->fw)
+		if (req->fw) {
+			if (req->fw_buf) {
+				kfree_const(req->fw_buf);
+				req->fw_buf = NULL;
+			}
 			release_firmware(req->fw);
+			req->fw = NULL;
+		}
 	}
 
 	vfree(test_fw_config->reqs);
@@ -586,6 +593,8 @@ static ssize_t trigger_request_store(str
 
 	mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
 	release_firmware(test_firmware);
+	if (test_fw_config->reqs)
+		__test_release_all_firmware();
 	test_firmware = NULL;
 	rc = request_firmware(&test_firmware, name, dev);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -686,6 +695,8 @@ static ssize_t trigger_async_request_sto
 	mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
 	release_firmware(test_firmware);
 	test_firmware = NULL;
+	if (test_fw_config->reqs)
+		__test_release_all_firmware();
 	rc = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, 1, name, dev, GFP_KERNEL,
 				     NULL, trigger_async_request_cb);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -728,6 +739,8 @@ static ssize_t trigger_custom_fallback_s
 
 	mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
 	release_firmware(test_firmware);
+	if (test_fw_config->reqs)
+		__test_release_all_firmware();
 	test_firmware = NULL;
 	rc = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, FW_ACTION_NOUEVENT, name,
 				     dev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL,
@@ -790,6 +803,8 @@ static int test_fw_run_batch_request(voi
 						 test_fw_config->buf_size);
 		if (!req->fw)
 			kfree(test_buf);
+		else
+			req->fw_buf = test_buf;
 	} else {
 		req->rc = test_fw_config->req_firmware(&req->fw,
 						       req->name,
@@ -845,6 +860,7 @@ static ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_
 		req->fw = NULL;
 		req->idx = i;
 		req->name = test_fw_config->name;
+		req->fw_buf = NULL;
 		req->dev = dev;
 		init_completion(&req->completion);
 		req->task = kthread_run(test_fw_run_batch_request, req,
@@ -944,6 +960,7 @@ ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_async_s
 	for (i = 0; i < test_fw_config->num_requests; i++) {
 		req = &test_fw_config->reqs[i];
 		req->name = test_fw_config->name;
+		req->fw_buf = NULL;
 		req->fw = NULL;
 		req->idx = i;
 		init_completion(&req->completion);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ