[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZID1LnvAj1lamHhv@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 23:22:54 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>, thomas@...ch.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nolibc patches, still possible for 6.5 ?
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:03:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > (There were some kernel test
> > > robot complaints as well, valid or not I am not sure.)
> >
> > You mean in relation with nolibc stuff (or nolibc-test) or something
> > totally different ?
>
> Apologies, this was me being confused and failing to look closely.
>
> The complaints were not about nolibc, but rather about my patches that
> they were on top of. Not your problem!
Ah no problem :-)
> And please let me know when the next batch from your tree are ready to go.
> (You might have been saying that they were in your recent emails, but
> I thought I should double-check.)
No pb, I just sent it while you were writing and our emails have crossed :-)
In short, it's ready now with branch 20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a but if you
need any more info (more detailed summary, a public repost of the whole
series etc), just let me know. And I faced 2 kernel build errors on s390x
and riscv about rcu_task something, though you might be interested :-/
Thanks,
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists