[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10f38131-bf85-dce4-fedd-15f0859d46f3@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:05:19 +0530
From: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
broonie@...nel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Mastan.Katragadda@....com,
Arungopal.kondaveeti@....com, mario.limonciello@....com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Syed Saba Kareem <Syed.SabaKareem@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] ASoC: amd: ps: create platform devices based on
acp config
On 06/06/23 19:30, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>> +/**
>> + * acp_pdev_mask corresponds to platform device mask based on audio endpoint combinations.
>> + * acp_pdev_mask will be calculated based on ACPI Scan under ACP PCI device and
>> + * ACP PIN Configuration.
>> + * Based acp_pdev_mask, platform devices will be created.
>> + * Below are possible platform device combinations.
>> + * 1) ACP PDM Controller, dmic-codec, machine driver platform device node
>> + * 2) ACP PDM Controller , dmic-codec, SW0 SoundWire manager instance, platform device for
>> + * SoundWire DMA driver
>> + * 3) SW0, SW1 SoundWire manager instances, platform device for SoundWire DMA driver
>> + * 4) ACP PDM Controller, dmic-codec, SDW0, SDW1 manager instances, platform device for
>> + * SoundWire DMA driver
>> + * ACP63_PDM_DEV_MASK corresponds to platform device mask for ACP PDM controller.
>> + * ACP63_SDW_DEV_MASK corresponds to platform device mask for SDW manager instances.
>> + * ACP63_SDW_PDM_DEV_MASK corresponds to platform device mask for ACP PDM + SDW manager combination
>> + */
>> +enum acp_pdev_mask {
>> + ACP63_PDM_DEV_MASK = 1,
>> + ACP63_SDW_DEV_MASK,
>> + ACP63_SDW_PDM_DEV_MASK,
>> +};
> This does not look like a mask, the definitions prevent bit-wise
> operations from happening.
>
> Either use BIT(0), BIT(1), BIT(2) or GENMASK(1, 0), or demote this to a
> regular enum (e.g. pdev_config or something)
ACP63_PDM_DEV_MASK - Will be set only PDM config is selected.
ACP63_SDW_DEV_MASK - will be set only when SDW config is selected.
ACP63_SDW_PDM_DEV_MASK - will be set only when ACP PDM + SDW config is selected.
We have already added comments for above masks definitions in code.
Our intention is to use it as a mask.
We don't think it breaks anything.
Currently, we have only one extra check for SDW case, in suspend/resume scenario.
Based on SoundWire power mode, ACP PCI driver should invoke acp_deinit/acp_init()
calls in suspend/resume callbacks.
For this, we have added check for pdev_mask. If pdev_mask is set to ACP63_SDW_DEV_MASK
(2) or ACP63_SDW_PDM_DEV_MASK(3), in this case only by checking SoundWire power mode
invoke acp_deinit/acp_init() sequence. This is already in place.
There won't be any extra checks will be added in the future.
As per our understanding, it's good to go.
>> +
>> struct pdm_stream_instance {
>> u16 num_pages;
>> u16 channels;
>> @@ -95,14 +144,38 @@ struct pdm_dev_data {
>> struct snd_pcm_substream *capture_stream;
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * struct acp63_dev_data - acp pci driver context
>> + * @acp63_base: acp mmio base
>> + * @res: resource
>> + * @pdev: array of child platform device node structures
>> + * @acp_lock: used to protect acp common registers
>> + * @sdw_fw_node: SoundWire controller fw node handle
>> + * @pdev_mask: platform device mask
>> + * @pdev_count: platform devices count
>> + * @pdm_dev_index: pdm platform device index
>> + * @sdw_manager_count: SoundWire manager instance count
>> + * @sdw0_dev_index: SoundWire Manager-0 platform device index
>> + * @sdw1_dev_index: SoundWire Manager-1 platform device index
>> + * @sdw_dma_dev_index: SoundWire DMA controller platform device index
>> + * @acp_reset: flag set to true when bus reset is applied across all
>> + * the active SoundWire manager instances
>> + */
>> +
>> struct acp63_dev_data {
>> void __iomem *acp63_base;
>> struct resource *res;
>> struct platform_device *pdev[ACP63_DEVS];
>> struct mutex acp_lock; /* protect shared registers */
>> + struct fwnode_handle *sdw_fw_node;
>> u16 pdev_mask;
>> u16 pdev_count;
>> u16 pdm_dev_index;
>> + u8 sdw_manager_count;
>> + u16 sdw0_dev_index;
>> + u16 sdw1_dev_index;
>> + u16 sdw_dma_dev_index;
>> + bool acp_reset;
>> };
>>
>> int snd_amd_acp_find_config(struct pci_dev *pci);
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> index 54752d6040d6..816c22e7f1ab 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> @@ -15,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <sound/pcm_params.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h>
>>
>> #include "acp63.h"
>>
>> @@ -119,37 +121,162 @@ static irqreturn_t acp63_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> return IRQ_NONE;
>> }
>>
>> -static void get_acp63_device_config(u32 config, struct pci_dev *pci,
>> - struct acp63_dev_data *acp_data)
>> +static int sdw_amd_scan_controller(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct acp63_dev_data *acp_data;
>> + struct fwnode_handle *link;
>> + char name[32];
>> + u32 sdw_manager_bitmap;
>> + u8 count = 0;
>> + u32 acp_sdw_power_mode = 0;
>> + int index;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + acp_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + acp_data->acp_reset = true;
>> + /* Found controller, find links supported */
>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array((acp_data->sdw_fw_node), "mipi-sdw-manager-list",
>> + &sdw_manager_bitmap, 1);
> IIRC this is only defined in the DisCo 2.0 spec, previous editions had a
> 'mipi-master-count'. A comment would not hurt to point to the minimal
> DisCo spec version.
We will add comment.
>> +
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to read mipi-sdw-manager-list: %d\n", ret);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + count = hweight32(sdw_manager_bitmap);
>> + /* Check count is within bounds */
>> + if (count > AMD_SDW_MAX_MANAGERS) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Manager count %d exceeds max %d\n", count, AMD_SDW_MAX_MANAGERS);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!count) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "No SoundWire Managers detected\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI reports %d SoundWire Manager devices\n", count);
>> + acp_data->sdw_manager_count = count;
>> + for (index = 0; index < count; index++) {
>> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "mipi-sdw-link-%d-subproperties", index);
>> + link = fwnode_get_named_child_node(acp_data->sdw_fw_node, name);
>> + if (!link) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Manager node %s not found\n", name);
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(link, "amd-sdw-power-mode", &acp_sdw_power_mode);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + /*
>> + * when SoundWire configuration is selected from acp pin config,
>> + * based on manager instances count, acp init/de-init sequence should be
>> + * executed as part of PM ops only when Bus reset is applied for the active
>> + * SoundWire manager instances.
>> + */
>> + if (acp_sdw_power_mode != AMD_SDW_POWER_OFF_MODE) {
>> + acp_data->acp_reset = false;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int get_acp63_device_config(u32 config, struct pci_dev *pci, struct acp63_dev_data *acp_data)
>> {
>> struct acpi_device *dmic_dev;
>> + struct acpi_device *sdw_dev;
>> const union acpi_object *obj;
>> bool is_dmic_dev = false;
>> + bool is_sdw_dev = false;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> dmic_dev = acpi_find_child_device(ACPI_COMPANION(&pci->dev), ACP63_DMIC_ADDR, 0);
>> if (dmic_dev) {
>> + /* is_dmic_dev flag will be set when ACP PDM controller device exists */
>> if (!acpi_dev_get_property(dmic_dev, "acp-audio-device-type",
> usually properties start with the 'mipi-' or 'vendor-' prefix. Is there
> a missing 'amd-' here or is 'acp-' unique enough?
It's not SoundWire related MIPI/Vendor property.
Our BIOS changes are freeze. We can't modify this one as of this moment.
We will consider it for next platform.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists