linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 14/20] x86/efistub: Prefer EFI memory attributes protocol over DXE services

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230607072342.4054036-15-ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  7 Jun 2023 09:23:36 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@...ras.ru>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 14/20] x86/efistub: Prefer EFI memory attributes protocol over DXE services

Currently, the EFI stub relies on DXE services in some cases to clear
non-execute restrictions from page allocations that need to be
executable. This is dodgy, because DXE services are not specified by
UEFI but by PI, and they are not intended for consumption by OS loaders.
However, no alternative existed at the time.

Now, there is a new UEFI protocol that should be used instead, so if it
exists, prefer it over the DXE services calls.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 29 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
index f48a2e795d885af8..abcd5703e9f3f980 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ const efi_system_table_t *efi_system_table;
 const efi_dxe_services_table_t *efi_dxe_table;
 u32 image_offset __section(".data");
 static efi_loaded_image_t *image = NULL;
+static efi_memory_attribute_protocol_t *memattr;
 
 typedef union sev_memory_acceptance_protocol sev_memory_acceptance_protocol_t;
 union sev_memory_acceptance_protocol {
@@ -233,12 +234,18 @@ void efi_adjust_memory_range_protection(unsigned long start,
 	unsigned long rounded_start, rounded_end;
 	unsigned long unprotect_start, unprotect_size;
 
-	if (efi_dxe_table == NULL)
-		return;
-
 	rounded_start = rounddown(start, EFI_PAGE_SIZE);
 	rounded_end = roundup(start + size, EFI_PAGE_SIZE);
 
+	if (memattr != NULL) {
+		efi_call_proto(memattr, clear_memory_attributes, rounded_start,
+			       rounded_end - rounded_start, EFI_MEMORY_XP);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (efi_dxe_table == NULL)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Don't modify memory region attributes, they are
 	 * already suitable, to lower the possibility to
@@ -801,6 +808,7 @@ void __noreturn efi_stub_entry(efi_handle_t handle,
 			       efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
 			       struct boot_params *boot_params)
 {
+	efi_guid_t guid = EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PROTOCOL_GUID;
 	unsigned long bzimage_addr = (unsigned long)startup_32;
 	unsigned long buffer_start, buffer_end;
 	struct setup_header *hdr = &boot_params->hdr;
@@ -812,13 +820,18 @@ void __noreturn efi_stub_entry(efi_handle_t handle,
 	if (efi_system_table->hdr.signature != EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_SIGNATURE)
 		efi_exit(handle, EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER);
 
-	efi_dxe_table = get_efi_config_table(EFI_DXE_SERVICES_TABLE_GUID);
-	if (efi_dxe_table &&
-	    efi_dxe_table->hdr.signature != EFI_DXE_SERVICES_TABLE_SIGNATURE) {
-		efi_warn("Ignoring DXE services table: invalid signature\n");
-		efi_dxe_table = NULL;
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_DXE_MEM_ATTRIBUTES)) {
+		efi_dxe_table = get_efi_config_table(EFI_DXE_SERVICES_TABLE_GUID);
+		if (efi_dxe_table &&
+		    efi_dxe_table->hdr.signature != EFI_DXE_SERVICES_TABLE_SIGNATURE) {
+			efi_warn("Ignoring DXE services table: invalid signature\n");
+			efi_dxe_table = NULL;
+		}
 	}
 
+	/* grab the memory attributes protocol if it exists */
+	efi_bs_call(locate_protocol, &guid, NULL, (void **)&memattr);
+
 	status = efi_setup_5level_paging();
 	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
 		efi_err("efi_setup_5level_paging() failed!\n");
-- 
2.39.2