[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ca9eb2b-4bc8-5883-a029-3eeca905fe6e@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:04:29 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
<oxffffaa@...il.com>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: nand: meson: Fix 'nand-rb' property
On 07.06.2023 12:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/06/2023 10:57, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07.06.2023 11:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 07/06/2023 10:40, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>> Hello Miquel,
>>>>
>>>> On 07.06.2023 10:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Arseniy,
>>>>>
>>>>> AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 22:35:07 +0300:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Add description of 'nand-rb' property. Use "Fixes" because this property
>>>>>> must be supported since the beginning. For this controller 'nand-rb' is
>>>>>> stored in the controller node (not in chip), because it has only single
>>>>>> r/b wire for all chips.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry if I mislead you in the first place, but you could definitely
>>>>> have two chips and only one with RB wired. It needs to be defined in
>>>>> the chips.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so to clarify: is it ok, that in bindings this property will be placed in the
>>>> chip, but in driver, i'm trying to read it from the controller node (thus in
>>>> dts file it will be also in controller node)?
>>>
>>> No, because how would your DTS pass validation? I understand you did not
>>> test the bindings, but this will improve, right?
>>
>> Ok, i'll follow DTS layout in the driver, "test the bindings" You mean "make dt_binding_check"?
>
> Yes. They were sent without testing.
>
> But please also test your DTS with dtbs_check.
Got it!
Thanks, Arseniy
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists