[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa9cd68b-645b-d997-e327-dc8335de913e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 04:27:55 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Nischala Yelchuri <niyelchu@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tyler Hicks <code@...icks.com>, boqun.feng@...il.com,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Nischala Yelchuri <niyelchu@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Trace hv_set_register()
On 6/6/23 18:35, Nischala Yelchuri wrote:
> void hv_set_register(unsigned int reg, u64 value)
> {
> + trace_hyperv_set_register(reg, value);
> +
> if (hv_nested)
> reg = hv_get_nested_reg(reg);
I can't help but wonder if this is just a patch for people that don't
know how to set kprobes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists