linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add SDX75 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ef231c75-e35c-6320-ed0e-7fc5e24d6afc@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2023 14:09:43 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        maz@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org, robimarko@...il.com
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add SDX75
 compatible

On 07/06/2023 13:47, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add compatible for EPSS CPUFREQ-HW on SDX75.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof