[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZICBvP33XyOswWFM@matsya>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 18:40:20 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: qcom: fix storing port config out-of-bounds
On 01-06-23, 12:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The 'qcom_swrm_ctrl->pconfig' has size of QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS (14),
> however we index it starting from 1, not 0, to match real port numbers.
> This can lead to writing port config past 'pconfig' bounds and
> overwriting next member of 'qcom_swrm_ctrl' struct. Reported also by
> smatch:
>
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c:1269 qcom_swrm_get_port_config() error: buffer overflow 'ctrl->pconfig' 14 <= 14
>
> Fixes: 9916c02ccd74 ("soundwire: qcom: cleanup internal port config indexing")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202305201301.sCJ8UDKV-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> index 7cb1b7eba814..88a772075907 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
> u32 intr_mask;
> u8 rcmd_id;
> u8 wcmd_id;
> - struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS];
> + /* Port numbers are 1 - 14 */
> + struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS + 1];
Better use SDW_MAX_PORTS ?
> struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
> enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES + 1];
> int (*reg_read)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, u32 *val);
> --
> 2.34.1
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists