lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168614595209.134969.6798849940705397930.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 07 Jun 2023 07:52:32 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     hch@....de, yukuai3@...wei.com, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] blk-ioc: fix recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() in
 ioc_clear_queue()


On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 09:14:38 +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() is not safe, because spin_unlock_irq()
> will enable irq unconditionally:
> 
> spin_lock_irq	queue_lock	-> disable irq
> spin_lock_irq	ioc->lock
> spin_unlock_irq ioc->lock	-> enable irq
> /*
>  * AA dead lock will be triggered if current context is preempted by irq,
>  * and irq try to hold queue_lock again.
>  */
> spin_unlock_irq queue_lock
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] blk-ioc: fix recursive spin_lock/unlock_irq() in ioc_clear_queue()
      commit: a7cfa0af0c88353b4eb59db5a2a0fbe35329b3f9

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ