[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95c1cc02-cd5d-c454-7c29-e4c42a6bd54c@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 19:56:51 +0530
From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, kevin.tian@...el.com,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Fix possible memory leak of 'domain'
Jason,
On 6/7/2023 7:52 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:07:42PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
>> free memory of domain before return NULL.
>>
>> Fixes: 29f54745f245 ("iommu/amd: Add missing domain type checks")
>> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> index dc1ec6849775..f08e65629c74 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
>> @@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ static struct protection_domain *protection_domain_alloc(unsigned int type)
>> } else if (type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA || type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ) {
>> pgtable = amd_iommu_pgtable;
>> } else {
>> - return NULL;
>> + goto out_err;
>> }
>
> It might be nicer to order to allocation after the type checks, it is
> more consistent with the other drivers
>
> This is fine too
Right. We are working on cleaning up/re-arranging this code path.
Hopefully I will have patches soon.
-Vasant
Powered by blists - more mailing lists