linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next v5 10/14] splice, net: Fix SPLICE_F_MORE signalling in splice_direct_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230607140559.2263470-11-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed,  7 Jun 2023 15:05:55 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 10/14] splice, net: Fix SPLICE_F_MORE signalling in splice_direct_to_actor()

splice_direct_to_actor() doesn't manage SPLICE_F_MORE correctly[1] - and,
as a result, it incorrectly signals/fails to signal MSG_MORE when splicing
to a socket.  The problem I'm seeing happens when a short splice occurs
because we got a short read due to hitting the EOF on a file: as the length
read (read_len) is less than the remaining size to be spliced (len),
SPLICE_F_MORE (and thus MSG_MORE) is set.

The issue is that, for the moment, we have no way to know *why* the short
read occurred and so can't make a good decision on whether we *should* keep
MSG_MORE set.

MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST was added to work around this, but that is also set
incorrectly under some circumstances - for example if a short read fills a
single pipe_buffer, but the next read would return more (seqfile can do
this).

This was observed with the multi_chunk_sendfile tests in the tls kselftest
program.  Some of those tests would hang and time out when the last chunk
of file was less than the sendfile request size:

	build/kselftest/net/tls -r tls.12_aes_gcm.multi_chunk_sendfile

This has been observed before[2] and worked around in AF_TLS[3].

Fix this by making splice_direct_to_actor() always signal SPLICE_F_MORE if
we haven't yet hit the requested operation size.  SPLICE_F_MORE remains
signalled if the user passed it in to splice() but otherwise gets cleared
when we've read sufficient data to fulfill the request.

If, however, we get a premature EOF from ->splice_read(), have sent at
least one byte and SPLICE_F_MORE was not set by the caller, ->splice_eof()
will be invoked.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>
cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/499791.1685485603@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1591392508-14592-1-git-send-email-pooja.trivedi@stackpath.com/ [2]
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=d452d48b9f8b1a7f8152d33ef52cfd7fe1735b0a [3]
---

Notes:
    ver #4)
     - Use ->splice_eof() to signal a premature EOF to the splice output.

 fs/splice.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
index 67dbd85db207..67ddaac1f5c5 100644
--- a/fs/splice.c
+++ b/fs/splice.c
@@ -1063,13 +1063,17 @@ ssize_t splice_direct_to_actor(struct file *in, struct splice_desc *sd,
 	 */
 	bytes = 0;
 	len = sd->total_len;
+
+	/* Don't block on output, we have to drain the direct pipe. */
 	flags = sd->flags;
+	sd->flags &= ~SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK;
 
 	/*
-	 * Don't block on output, we have to drain the direct pipe.
+	 * We signal MORE until we've read sufficient data to fulfill the
+	 * request and we keep signalling it if the caller set it.
 	 */
-	sd->flags &= ~SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK;
 	more = sd->flags & SPLICE_F_MORE;
+	sd->flags |= SPLICE_F_MORE;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!pipe_empty(pipe->head, pipe->tail));
 
@@ -1085,14 +1089,12 @@ ssize_t splice_direct_to_actor(struct file *in, struct splice_desc *sd,
 		sd->total_len = read_len;
 
 		/*
-		 * If more data is pending, set SPLICE_F_MORE
-		 * If this is the last data and SPLICE_F_MORE was not set
-		 * initially, clears it.
+		 * If we now have sufficient data to fulfill the request then
+		 * we clear SPLICE_F_MORE if it was not set initially.
 		 */
-		if (read_len < len)
-			sd->flags |= SPLICE_F_MORE;
-		else if (!more)
+		if (read_len >= len && !more)
 			sd->flags &= ~SPLICE_F_MORE;
+
 		/*
 		 * NOTE: nonblocking mode only applies to the input. We
 		 * must not do the output in nonblocking mode as then we