linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Add drm module soft dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:50 +0800
From:   AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Add drm module soft dependency

Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> 於 2023年6月8日 週四 上午3:16寫道：
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/7/23 09:47, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:39:33PM +0800, AceLan Kao wrote:
> >
> >> What do you think if we unregister backlight devices if the backlight type
> >> is larger than the current registered one.
> >> Do this check in backlight_device_register() and unregister backlight
> >> devices by the order raw(1) > platform(2) > firmware(3)
> >> And maybe introduce a sticky bit into the backlight device if the backlight
> >> driver doesn't want to be removed.
> >
> > Hans looked at doing this, but there were some awkward corner cases.
> > When we first introduced this functionality, firmware was preferred to
> > platform was preferred to raw - but on Intel, at least, this behaviour
> > changed with later versions of Windows. I don't think there's a single
> > static policy that works, I think you need to pay attention to the hints
> > the platform gives you. How does Windows know which interface to use on
> > this platform? The simplest solution may actually just be for
> > dell-laptop to refuse to register a backlight if the platform claims to
> > be Windows 8 or later.
>
> I like that idea.
>
> AceLan, I guess that you hit this easy while testing on a (development)
> Meteor Lake platform ?
>
> I have had other/similar reports about Meteor Lake platforms.
>
> On hw from the last 10 years dell-laptop will not register
> its vendor-type backlight class device because
> acpi_video_get_backlight_type() will return acpi_backlight_video
> there (1) so it does not matter if the GPU driver shows up only
> later (2).
>
> But it seems that on Meteor Lake the ACPI tables will no longer
> contain acpi_video backlight control support which causes
> acpi_video_get_backlight_type() to return acpi_backlight_vendor (2).
> triggering the issue you are seeing.
>
> Can you give the attached patch a try please ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
> 1) Starting with kernel >= 6.2 acpi_video.c will only register
> the /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video# node after a drm/kms drivers
> asks it to register it.
>
> 2) The native GPU driver will tell the drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> code that native backlight control is available changing
> the return of acpi_video_get_backlight_type() to native, which
> is what loading the native GPU driver first also fixes this issue.

Hi Hans,

Yes, this patch works for me, thanks.

BTW, I encountered this issue on the RPL platform.