[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <648233e5ea44e_1433ac29493@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:02:45 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
<bwidawsk@...nel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <terry.bowman@....com>, <rrichter@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 07/26] cxl/acpi: Moving add_host_bridge_uport() around
Minor quibble with the gerund phrase and this not being clear about what
it is doing. Just say:
"cxl/acpi: Move add_host_bridge_uport() after cxl_get_chbs()"
Terry Bowman wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
>
> Just moving code to reorder functions to later share cxl_get_chbs()
> with add_host_bridge_uport().
>
> This makes changes in the next patch visible. No other changes at all.
Other than subject line, looks good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists