[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230608205416.4mezxtxoqxwebdk5@treble>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:54:16 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Improve rate-limiting for missing __noreturn
warnings
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:23:32AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> If a function with a lot of call sites is missing __noreturn, it could
> result in a lot of duplicate warnings (one for each call site).
>
> Each call site's function is already rate-limited to one warning per
> function via WARN_INSN(). Do the same for the callee (the "missing
> __noreturn" function itself).
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/objtool/check.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> index 8936a05f0e5a..bb2ed34cb90e 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -4507,9 +4507,13 @@ static int validate_reachable_instructions(struct objtool_file *file)
> if (prev_insn && prev_insn->dead_end) {
> call_dest = insn_call_dest(prev_insn);
> if (call_dest && !ignore_noreturn_call(prev_insn)) {
> - WARN_INSN(insn, "%s() is missing a __noreturn annotation",
> - call_dest->name);
> - warnings++;
> + if (!call_dest->warned) {
> + WARN_INSN(insn, "%s() is missing a __noreturn annotation",
> + call_dest->name);
> + warnings++;
> + call_dest->warned = 1;
> + }
> +
NAK - this spits out a bunch of unreachables, will need to tweak it a
bit.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists