[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230608083400.GH998233@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:34:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/idle: disable tick in idle=poll idle entry
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:10:46PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Commit a5183862e76fdc25f36b39c2489b816a5c66e2e5
> ("tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit") allows
> a nohz_full CPU to enter idle and return from it with the
> scheduler tick disabled (since the tick might be undesired noise).
>
> The idle=poll case still unconditionally restarts the tick when entering
> idle.
>
> To reduce the noise for that case as well, stop the tick when entering
> idle, for the idle=poll case.
>
> tick_nohz_idle_exit (called if the NEED_RESCHED bit is set)
> is responsible for re-enabling the tick when necessary.
Who cares and why?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists